Issue
I am trying to test the text of an ActionPage using Espresso. However, when I run the Ui Automation Viewer I can see that the ActionPage is being shown as a View instead of an ActionView and it does not have a TextView.
I have tried checking for the ActionLabel text like this but that does not work:
onView(withClassName(equalToIgnoringCase("android.support.wearable.view.ActionLabel"))).check(matches(withText("MyText")));
I have an id for my ActionPage so I can find it with onView(withId(R.id.actionPage))
but I dont know how to access its children to get at ActionLabel text. I tried writing a custom matcher but this also does not work:
onView(withId(R.id.actionPage)).check(matches(withChildText("MyText")));
static Matcher<View> withChildText(final String string) {
return new BoundedMatcher<View, View>(View.class) {
@Override
public boolean matchesSafely(View view) {
ViewGroup viewGroup = ((ViewGroup) view);
//return (((TextView) actionLabel).getText()).equals(string);
for(int i = 0; i < view.getChildCount(); i++){
View child = view.getChildAt(i);
if (child instanceof TextView) {
return ((TextView) child).getText().toString().equals(string);
}
}
return false;
}
@Override
public void describeTo(Description description) {
description.appendText("with child text: " + string);
}
};
}
Could someone please help me out, the ActionLabel does not seem to have an id by itself and its not a TextView...how can I check the text inside of it?
+------>FrameLayout{id=-1, visibility=VISIBLE, width=320, height=320, has-focus=false, has-focusable=false, has-window-focus=true, is-clickable=false, is-enabled=true, is-focused=false, is-focusable=false, is-layout-requested=false, is-selected=false, root-is-layout-requested=false, has-input-connection=false, x=0.0, y=0.0, child-count=1}
|
+------->ActionPage{id=2131689620, res-name=actionPage, visibility=VISIBLE, width=320, height=320, has-focus=false, has-focusable=false, has-window-focus=true, is-clickable=false, is-enabled=true, is-focused=false, is-focusable=false, is-layout-requested=false, is-selected=false, root-is-layout-requested=false, has-input-connection=false, x=0.0, y=0.0, child-count=2}
|
+-------->ActionLabel{id=-1, visibility=VISIBLE, width=285, height=111, has-focus=false, has-focusable=false, has-window-focus=true, is-clickable=false, is-enabled=true, is-focused=false, is-focusable=false, is-layout-requested=false, is-selected=false, root-is-layout-requested=false, has-input-connection=false, x=17.0, y=209.0}
|
+-------->CircularButton{id=-1, visibility=VISIBLE, width=144, height=144, has-focus=false, has-focusable=false, has-window-focus=true, is-clickable=true, is-enabled=true, is-focused=false, is-focusable=false, is-layout-requested=false, is-selected=false, root-is-layout-requested=false, has-input-connection=false, x=88.0, y=65.0}
Solution
You can use withParent
with allOf
:
onView(
allOf(
withParent(withId(R.id.actionPage)),
isAssignableFrom(ActionLabel.class)))
.check(matches(withActionLabel(is("MyText"))));
Unfortunately ActionLabel
does not expose its text via getText()
, so instead of the standard withText()
matcher, you have to write a custom one using reflection:
private static Matcher<Object> withActionLabel(
final Matcher<CharSequence> textMatcher) {
return new BoundedMatcher<Object, ActionLabel>(ActionLabel.class) {
@Override public boolean matchesSafely(ActionLabel label) {
try {
java.lang.reflect.Field f = label.getClass().getDeclaredField("mText");
f.setAccessible(true);
CharSequence text = (CharSequence) f.get(label);
return textMatcher.matches(text);
} catch (NoSuchFieldException e) {
return false;
} catch (IllegalAccessException e) {
return false;
}
}
@Override public void describeTo(Description description) {
description.appendText("with action label: ");
textMatcher.describeTo(description);
}
};
}
More info: http://blog.sqisland.com/2015/05/espresso-match-toolbar-title.html
Please file a bug to request Google to add a public method ActionLabel.getText()
so you can test it without reflection.
Answered By - chiuki
0 comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.