Issue
I got a problem on my ExpandableListAdapter
. I used a custom image as the indicator
, because I wanted to position it to the right and not to the left of the menu item. I also need to hide the indicator
on some items.
My drawable looks like this:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<selector xmlns:android="http://schemas.android.com/apk/res/android">
<item
android:state_expanded="true"
android:drawable="@drawable/arrow_up" />
<item
android:drawable="@drawable/arrow_down" />
</selector>
So I make use of the state_expanded
of Android
.
My DrawerLayout
has this LinearLayout
in it:
<LinearLayout
android:id="@+id/drawer_linear_layout"
android:layout_width="@dimen/menu_width"
android:layout_height="match_parent"
android:layout_gravity="start"
android:orientation="vertical">
<ExpandableListView
android:id="@+id/navigationmenu"
android:layout_width="match_parent"
android:layout_height="match_parent"
android:layout_gravity="start"
android:choiceMode="singleChoice"
android:layout_marginTop="@dimen/nav_header_height"
android:childDivider="@android:color/transparent"
android:headerDividersEnabled="true"
android:groupIndicator="@android:color/transparent"
android:background="@drawable/border_shadow">
</ExpandableListView>
</LinearLayout>
I hide the normal groupIndicator
manually to add the custom Drawable
later in code.
My ExpandableListAdapter
seems to be correct:
public class ExpandableListAdapter extends BaseExpandableListAdapter {
...
private static final int[] EMPTY_STATE_SET = {};
private static final int[] GROUP_EXPANDED_STATE_SET = { android.R.attr.state_expanded };
private static final int[][] GROUP_STATE_SETS = {
EMPTY_STATE_SET, // 0
GROUP_EXPANDED_STATE_SET //1
};
...
@Override
public View getGroupView(int groupPosition, boolean isExpanded, View convertView, ViewGroup parent) {
MOMenuItem headerTitle = (MOMenuItem) getGroup(groupPosition);
LayoutInflater infalInflater = (LayoutInflater) this.mContext
.getSystemService(Context.LAYOUT_INFLATER_SERVICE);
LinearLayout linLayout = (LinearLayout) infalInflater.inflate(R.layout.list_header, parent, false);
convertView = linLayout;
View indicator = convertView.findViewById(R.id.indicator_image);
if (groupPosition == 1) {
Log.d("GetGroupView", "Called!");
}
if (indicator != null) {
ImageView indicatorImage = (ImageView) indicator;
if (getChildrenCount(groupPosition) == 0) {
indicatorImage.setVisibility(View.INVISIBLE);
} else {
if (groupPosition == 1) {
Log.d("IsExpanded is", "" + isExpanded);
}
indicatorImage.setVisibility(View.VISIBLE);
int stateSetIndex = (isExpanded ? 1 : 0);
if (groupPosition == 1) {
Log.d("State Index", "" + stateSetIndex);
}
Drawable drawable = indicatorImage.getDrawable();
drawable.setState(GROUP_STATE_SETS[stateSetIndex]);
}
}
...
return convertView;
}
}
The problem is that the indicator
doesn't get updated. However, the output of the Log
-Statements for the item at index 1, when opened is:
- GetGroupView: Called!
- IsExpanded is: true
- State Index: 1
The indicator
stays the same.
Solution
After long research and trial and error I did not find a way to make it work with states. However, I used the images itself like the following:
public View getGroupView(int groupPosition, boolean isExpanded, View convertView, ViewGroup parent) {
MOMenuItem headerTitle = (MOMenuItem) getGroup(groupPosition);
LayoutInflater infalInflater = (LayoutInflater) this.mContext
.getSystemService(Context.LAYOUT_INFLATER_SERVICE);
LinearLayout linLayout = (LinearLayout) infalInflater.inflate(R.layout.list_header, parent, false);
convertView = linLayout;
View indicator = convertView.findViewById(R.id.indicator_image);
if (indicator != null) {
ImageView indicatorImage = (ImageView) indicator;
if (getChildrenCount(groupPosition) == 0) {
indicatorImage.setVisibility(View.INVISIBLE);
} else {
indicatorImage.setVisibility(View.VISIBLE);
if (isExpanded) {
indicatorImage.setImageResource(R.drawable.arrow_up);
} else {
indicatorImage.setImageResource(R.drawable.arrow_down);
}
}
}
...
}
Sadly, the cleaner solution with a drawable and a state wasn't working. I hope this will help others stumbling upon this question.
Answered By - Brudus
0 comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.